|
Press Release
May 31, 2003
OBSTRCUTING
THE SUDANS PEACE:
STATE
TERRORISM, CIVIL WAR, AND RACISM
At the time peace
negotiations are hopefully moving the Sudan into a better stage of national
consensus, as has been recently ascertained by the Cairo Declaration
of the Democratic Unionist, Umma, and SPLM parties (May 25, 2003) based
on the NDAs nationally-recognized agreements for the re-establishment
of regular democracy and the permanent and just peace all over the country,
the NIF terrorist rule continues to obstruct the peace process, being
the sole beneficiary of state violence, terrorism, racism, arbitrary
arrest, torture, and the regrettable policy of escalating armed conflict
and civil war in the most impoverished regions of DarFur, as well the
dehumanizing starving of the indigenous peoples of Upper Nile and Bahr
al-Ghazal.
Added to this heinous
record of human rights abuses and the crimes against humanity, the Sudan
Government continues to obstruct the Sudans peace with the irresponsible
rejection of the national identity of Khartoum, the capitol city of
Sudan that has historically maintained a secular mode of administration
before it was officially converted by the NIF military coup into an
international center of terrorism and racism to serve the Muslim Brotherhoods
indoctrinating groups in gross violation of the countrys heritage
and constitutional law and the international human rights norms. The
peace-obstructing stand of the regime is clearly stated in the rejection
of the Cairo Declaration by the presidential peace adviser,
Ghazi Salah Eddin Atabani, as well as the other Muslim Brotherhood leaders.
The racism and
acts of terrorism of the ruling regime is further extended to curtail
the freedom of expression, press, and publication. Although practically
suppressed by the notorious NIFs coup decrees, the overruling
power of the president, as press patron, over the established authorities
of the government-controlled National Press Council virtually leaves
no margin for the non-governmental journalists, publishing firms, or
research centers to practice minimum standards of the freedom of expression.
The Sudan Government security forces are equally empowered to arbitrarily
arrest, detain and torture Sudanese journalists or ban their published
materials to intimidate them with bankruptcy and other financial problems.
The Sudan Human
Rights Organization Cairo Office is gravely concerned for the Sudan
Governments continuous obstructing of the peace process. The government
continues to arrest the political opponents and the journalists who
legally exercise the fundamental right of the freedom of expression
in accordance with the law. The most recent arrest of the Umma party
senior officials, Adam Mousa Madibbo and Abd al-Rahman Dosa, and
the harassment of al-Sahaffa Journal and her editorial team, including
editor-in-chief Nuraddin Medani and his assistants in DarFur and Khartoum
who have all criticized the Sudan Governments repressive policies
and practices in DarFur are mainly aimed to reverse the emerging climate
of peace.
SHRO-Cairo condemns
in the strongest terms possible all these acts of terrorism and the
racist policy of the National Press Council and its collaboration with
the security forces against the Khartoum Monitor, the countrys
English journal. As is clearly stated in Acting-Editor-in-Chief Nhial
Bol Akans Memo on suspension of the Khartoum Monitor Newspaper:
On 12, April
2003, one of the Khartoum Monitor contributors was arrested by the security
and a very senior officer insisted the National Security Organ is ready
to assist us financially
the arrest of Edward was a pressure
on us
The 6th of April 2003, I noticed that the security organ
had already stepped in for pressure and the nature of my arrest was
the first of its kind because I was arrested at odd hours when the official
working hours were over and my journalistic immunity was not lifted
through Journalists' Union. I was tortured severely as if as I was the
one who wrote the article. I was made to stand in the water for five
hours while facing the wall. Two policemen were insulting me, depicting
me as a devil, anti-Islam when the paper was the one that published
the article. I only represented the paper and the writer was Victor
Ladu Darious. How then did I become a devil and what made these people
to use abusive language when I was arrested simply because I represented
the Monitor?
the security attitude towards Khartoum Monitor is
very discriminative ... All the cases raised against the Khartoum Monitor
are only aimed for pressure not more than that. The aim
is geared
to impose more restrictions on the newspaper and this is a violation
to freedom of expression and access to information
the recent
fines and suspension against Khartoum Monitor and me were aimed to cause
us financial losses and the security organ had succeeded in this
professionally the interference of the security organ in the press freedom
is taking shape for the worst despite the lifting of censorship on us
since 2002
We believe all the cases against us are political
ones intended to suppress our national role. We believe the courts are
not fair in their decision and they are not neutral therefore such punishments
are imposed
The current campaign against Monitor
is part
of the historical intimidation aimed against the people of Southern
Sudan
The judge ordered us to pay the fine of 15 million Sudanese
pounds and he indicated that there was a court, which fined Khartoum
Monitor in May 2000
this was a great lie for the Monitor did
not exist in May 2000. We started to work in September 2000.
These egregious
violations that the Sudan Governments National Press Council,
Security, and Courts have lawlessly exercised against the Khartoum Monitor
are shamelessly racist acts of terrorism that should be nationally and
internationally condemned and must be immediately stopped by the competent
authority, by law.
- The Sudan Human
Rights Organization Cairo Office urges the Sudan Government to live
up to its national and international obligations towards the ongoing
process of peace. These obligations include the maintenance and the
development of the National Capitol of Sudan as a secular unit of
state administration, independent from any theological contention,
partisan plans, or political doctrine of any ruling or opposition
group.
- The government
must abandon all lawless security interference, intimidation, arrest,
or torture that curtail the right of political opponents, writers,
or journalists to exercise the freedom of expression, press, and publication.
- The Sudan Government
must abrogate the existing Press Act and its repressive censorial
organ, the National Press Council, which is regularly violating the
Sudan best laws as well as international human rights norms on the
freedom of expression in lawless collaboration with security forces
and government-controlled courts.
- To sustain the
ongoing process of peace, in accordance with the Machekos Peace Protocol,
the Sudan Government must restrain its authority organs from all acts
of state terrorism, civil war, racism or intimidation against the
Sudanese People of DarFur and South Sudan.
- The government
must seriously apply the right measures towards realization of the
right of self-determination, which requires a consistent building
of confidence between the Southerner Sudanese and their northerner
partner, as well as a systematic realization of the climates of peace
and the cessation of hostilities to strengthen the process of peace
for the whole country.
|