Articles
Observations
on Danforth's Report
Mahgoub El-Tigani
May 18, 2002
April 26, 2002, Mr.
John Danforth, the US Special Envoy for Peace, submitted his Report to
the President of the United States on the Outlook for Peace in Sudan.
The report referred
to "the anguish felt by many Americans for the suffering of the Sudanese
people" as expressed by President George Bush, Jr., who mandated
the envoy to "determine the commitment to peace by the parties to
the Sudan conflict and whether the United States should engage energetically
in efforts to bring peace to that country
The United States would
not create its own peace plan
Instead, we would encourage advocates
of existing plans to move forward in cooperation with one another"
affirms Danforth.
Mr. John Danforth
must be commended for the humanitarian approach adopted in his plan, the
important closure of the gap he managed to erect between the Government
of Sudan and the SPLM towards the peace process, the Days of Tranquility's
well attended objectives to facilitate humanitarian aid to the Nuba, the
completion of the bovine rinderpest eradication programs, besides the
steps taken to eradicate polio and guinea worm, and the important assurance
the Envoy obtained from Egypt and Kenya to "harmonize the Egyptian
Initiative with the IGAD."
Equally commended
are the Envoy's factual assessment of the human rights situation, the
attacks against civilians by both government and SPLM and their militias
as factors that hinder the advancement to peace, the war-inciting zero-sum
game, and the clear mention of Sudan Government's acts of war that indicate,
for the most part, the government's negativity.
Mr. John Danforth
met with "the senior leadership of the Sudanese Government and the
Sudan People's Liberation Movement (SPLM), the chief antagonists in the
Sudan conflict, as well as numerous other groups and individuals of civil
society."
Here, it is clear
that the US Envoy did not place an equal weight to the National Democratic
Alliance (NDA), the largest democratic opposition entity that is a major
partner in our country's conflict, despite the fact that the SPLM is a
prominent NDA force that is strongly supported by the NDA's leadership
and political constituencies to negotiate for the just and permanent peace,
in accordance with the NDA Charter and Resolutions.
In the opinion of
this writer, the apparent sidelining of the NDA in Danforth's report,
which never mentioned the NDA in name all over the report, needs to be
avoided in the next peace rounds to deal with the Sudan crisis in the
best way possible.
Because the "movement
toward peace would produce both short-term benefits and the prospect of
long-term rewards," as the Envoy's report states, the role to be
played in this vital process by the NDA as the biggest opposition entity
needs to be fully recognized and realized by the Sudanese government,
the US, and the International Community.
Although the Envoy
met with "numerous other groups and individuals of civil society,"
the Envoy did not say in his report that he met with the NDA.. Reader
thus infers that the Envoy might have considered the NDA only as part
of these "numerous other groups and individuals" that most likely
included leaders of several political parties and professional organizations.
Still, these groups
and/or individuals are not fairly comparable to the NDA's national democratic
opposition with respect to the size and weight of the supporting populations,
political agreement, etc. Mr. Danforth report seems quite cognizant of
this important fact. The Envoy says that he "has been told there
are at least a dozen different significant politico-tribal factions in
southern Sudan as well as influential religious and other civil society
groups."
The Envoy goes on
to say that, "A similar situation prevails in northern Sudan where
there are a number of influential politico-religious parties, ethnic,
regional and civil society groups and a politically powerful army as well
as the existing government." The Envoy, however, did not specify
the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) as the biggest and most unified
entity of all these "influential" groups.
The need for the
NDA's broad national umbrella is quite evident throughout the report,
although the writer never specified the NDA in his report. For sure, there
are several reasons that warrant a clear call upon the NDA to participate
as a full partner in all upcoming peace negotiations side-by-side with
the Government of Sudan and the SPLM.
(1) The "suffering
and injustice that is the reality in Sudan" in the words of Mr. John
C. Danforth is a cause of democracy, justice, and peace for the whole
country, north and south. Naturally then, the best strategy to improve
this reality is to increase the largest national involvement possible
through both short-term and long-term strategies.
(2) As a one-party
single-candidate presidential system, the ruling regime of Sudan is not
representative of the national democratic opposition, which includes most
of the significant and influential political, economic, and religious
forces of the country. These forces are well represented in the NDA.
(3) Grave irreconcilable
political, economic, and religious disagreements equally exist between
the northern Muslim and Christian opposition and the government's fundamentalist
group as they continue to exist between the SPLM and the government. The
configuration of the crisis as the north Arab Muslims versus the south
African Christians fails to capture the reality of Sudan.
(4) The government's
and the SPLM's commitment to the Envoy's plan needs to be strengthened
by encouraging and guaranteeing the direct participation of the NDA in
the resolution of the Sudan crisis. The NDA is the only national democratic
entity that includes on equal terms the largest Arab, non-Arab, Muslim,
non-Muslim democratic opposition groups of the whole country.
(5) The need to insure
democratic governance of the country through a principled application
of the right to self-determination and the distribution of wealth, as
the US Envoy correctly observes, requires a broad national commitment
that only the NDA agreements sufficiently provided and is capable to guarantee
between the south and north in the best manner possible. It is therefore
the Government's turn to live up to the NDA's national democracy.
(6) The Envoy's contention
that "No enduring settlement to Sudan's war can be achieved unless
the oil dimension is effectively addressed" is quite insightful.
The best settlement for the oil issue, nonetheless, would be possible
with the NDA's confidence building agreement between north and south -
the plans and agreements the government wastes the oil wealth to hinder.
(7) The discouragement
of the NDA from acting as a full partner in the peace process will polarize
the conflict on the oil fields between the competing military forces at
the expense of the NDA's Comprehensive Political Solution, the best Sudanized
version of a possibly workable transition to democracy in the Sudan..
(8) The emphasis
of the Envoy on the insurance of religious freedoms would be best maintained
with the NDA's Nairobi Declaration and the NDA's commitment to social
justice, democratic constitutionality, and international human rights
norms.
(9) The meeting of
the Envoy with Muslim and Christian clergy indicates that the groups with
whom he met "had not known each other, and had not previously heard
the other side express its views" before the meeting
(10) The Sudanese
Muslim religious entities, for example the large constituencies of the
Ansar and the Khatmiya as NDA-related politico-religious groups, and the
NDA's Christian groups, members of the SPLM or the other accommodating
southern and/or northern political groups maintain good understanding
on the right to religious beliefs and the spirit of tolerance the Sudanese
had always enjoyed before the extremist rule of the existing fundamentalist
government, and are determined to exercise under the NDA's next democratic
systems.
To conclude, the
Danforth Report is a significant contribution to the peace process in
our country. The Envoy's wisdom is eloquently expressed in his reference
to the role to be played by Sudan's political and civil society groups:
" It will be important to ensure that these various groupings have
the ability to make their views known and to participate in decisions
relating to peace and the political future of Sudan." This is a clear
advocacy of political solution to the Sudan crisis, which is a legitimate
outcome of the Envoy's righteous analysis of the Sudanese problem.
The NDA is a national
democratic entity rather than an ambiguous peace affiliate or some individual
leadership. Similar to what the late General Fathi Ahmed Ali, the Commander-in-Chief
of the Sudanese Armed Forces ascertained, the US Envoy emphasized the
fact that no party would win the war by military action.
The strategies adopted
and the steps encouraged, however, would perhaps attain more success if
the US Government and the International Community recognize the NDA as
the biggest unified body of the Sudanese opposition groups and act energetically
to support the NDA's participation in the peace process together with
the Sudanese civil society groups, instead of only concentrating on government/opposition
military forces to solve the political crisis of Sudan. The Danforth report
might have delineated the need to acknowledge this fact, even though the
report never mentioned the NDA in name.
On its part, the
NDA is advised to perfect its homework a step forward with popular support
to occupy the position it deserves as a most promising player in the Sudanese
contemporary affairs. For that purpose, the Umma should be encouraged
to rejoin the NDA ranks and the democratic parties, unions, and professional
groups that have not yet acquired the NDA's membership should be wholeheartedly
welcomed in the struggle for peace via the NDA's Comprehensive Political
Solution.
|